On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Stefan Kangas skangas@skangas.se wrote:
Unfree speech OR Free beer
You are correct!
you shouldn't have to choose between the two ;-)
This specific conclusion is wrong, however. The disjunction is inclusive, not exclusive. You CAN have both! ;-)
Right, but very few would want free beer at the cost of unfree speech (it wouldn't be free if it had a cost, so, in a way, it translates into exclusivity ;-) or a contradiction )
Sorry for the rant, I couldn't help myself ;-)
Thanks for spotting this mistake!
I actually had fun spotting it ^^
And, no I wasn't serioius, I just felt we could take out the "opposite" word :D
Peace and love!
Rikard