Dear Jonas and Bjorn,thank you for your prompt and valuable feedback.Il 18 giugno 2019 alle 17.33 Jonas Gamalielsson <jonas.gamalielsson@his.se> ha scritto:We have checked the three surveys and notice that the text for questionsare right justified, and we think they should be left justified. Severalquestions have formatting issues which may significantly inhibitrespondents from filling in the survey.I see, I didn't select a right justification so I guess that the Limesurvey system did it automatically. I have started to use it only recently, so I can try to fix it.We don't understand how the questions on the survey page "FOSS4SMEsImpact" relate to impact.In general, few questions actually address the purpose of the survey, asstated on the first page of the survey(s): "This survey has beendeveloped to assess the impact of the FOSS4SMEs main outputs onparticipating SMEs.". Most questions are at the level of the individualexperiences rather than at the organisational (SME) level.I get your point, which is all the way reasonable. However, I believe that we have to keep in mind the scope of this project and our present status. Do you believe it would be possible to report on an impact at organisational level over the remaining implementation time, also given the fact that the course has still not be released?I can't see this happening right now, but please give me input if I'm wrong. This is why I thought the easiest way to get away with this task would be to keep an individual approach.Further, we fear that the large number of questions may reduce theresponse rate.I could take out some of the questions in the two matrixes, but I'm afraid the free-text questions at the end of the survey have to stay because they are specifically asked in the proposal.We also find that there is a significant risk for low response rate, inparticular for SMEs, when using an online survey tool. Hence, it wouldbe appropriate to also provide an offline alternative (e.g. in the formof an ODS template that is provided to potential respondents so thatrespondents can fill it in, print it, and sent it back via post(landmail/airmail) to address privacy concerns).I developed an online survey because we thought with Katerina it would have made easier the dissemination of the questionnaire and the collection/analysis of responses. However, if you think you'll need an .odt version of it for the SMEs, that's not going to be an issue.Best,FrancescoOn 2019-06-14 18:44,francesco.agresta@dlearn.euwrote:Dear partners,I’m sending here the links for three impact surveys we are supposed tosend out and have filled in during these final months until the end ofthe project.They relate to three different target groups:1. SMEshttps://foss4smes.limequery.com/1?lang=en2. VET Centres, Trainers and Coaches7https://foss4smes.limequery.com/2?lang=en3. Project partners (i.e. ourselves)https://foss4smes.limequery.com/3?lang=enThe fourth target group to be surveyed will be “Other stakeholders”(e.g. policy makers in digital education). They will be part of a“formal consultation based on Intellectual Output 3”, which is stillunder development.However, this fourth group will be most probably approached exploitingthe occasion of the final conference in Brussels.In addition, please find attached a template for the collection of SMEscase studies showcasing the participants experience and improvedperformance. We are supposed to collect 5 case studies per partner, 30in total.These activities relate to the “Impact” strategy described at page 62-63of the proposal.I have started updating the Quality Plan accordingly with all thenecessary information (you will find it in keybase), and it will befinalised as soon as we are done also with the 4^th target group and theself-diagnostic tool (which is supposed to depict the “before” situationabout participants).Please have a look at the surveys and we will discuss them during ourmonthly call coming next Tuesday.Wish you a nice weekend,Descrizione: Descrizione: dlearn <http://www.dlearn.eu/>Francesco AgrestaEuropean Project ManagerEuropean Digital Learning NetworkVia Domenico Scarlatti, 3020124 MilanoMob. +39 3496027623francesco.agresta@dlearn.eu<mailto:francesco.agresta@dlearn.eu>www.dlearn.eu<http://www.dlearn.eu/>_______________________________________________Foss4smes-team mailing listFoss4smes-team@lists.fsfe.orghttps://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4smes-teamThis mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. Allparticipants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other:https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct--_______________________________________________Foss4smes-team mailing listFoss4smes-team@lists.fsfe.orghttps://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4smes-teamThis mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. Allparticipants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other:https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct