ESR has come out in favour of VA (surprise) on http://www.linux.com/opinion/newsitem.phtml?sid=1&aid=12507
As someone said, it's not worth correcting ESR's prodigious workload everywhere.
I think I'll quit from themes.org (OSDN). I should have done that a long time ago, but I thought there would be something to interest me on the new t.o, launching (or not?) in August. Now, do you think I should light a fire on my way out? How?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 12:56:22AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
As someone said, it's not worth correcting ESR's prodigious workload everywhere.
One wonders, though, what that response had to do with his philosophy as opposed to his stocks... or am I being cynical???
I think I'll quit from themes.org (OSDN). I should have done that a long time ago, but I thought there would be something to interest me on the new t.o, launching (or not?) in August. Now, do you think I should light a fire on my way out? How?
With matches ? :)
Write about it. Write why you're doing it. Heaven knows linuxtoday.com, advogato, osopinion etc. are all heaving with anti-FS stuff at the moment ('The Stallman Saga' and 'Thoughts on Open or Free licences for Documentation' are both up on advogato at the moment for example - it seems disproportionate. The documentation licences one is particularly funny, since it parades as a thought-provoking discussion, yet the bias appears on only the fourth line when the author states 'This article is released under the Open Documentation Licence', and then goes on to lambast the FDL...)
Cheers,
Alex.