On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 18:39, microdata wrote:
<snip>
Spammers getting smart, aka subscribe then spam?
Hugs, rui
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra rms@1407.org wrote:
Spammers getting smart, aka subscribe then spam?
That and they got scored down for only sending in HTML rather than in both. I think maybe tweaking the scores for this list may be a good idea? ;-)
|| On Tue, 05 Mar 2002 20:20:22 GMT || MJ Ray markj+0111@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
Spammers getting smart, aka subscribe then spam?
mr> That and they got scored down for only sending in HTML rather mr> than in both. I think maybe tweaking the scores for this list mr> may be a good idea? ;-)
I think the auto-whitelist is one major part of the problem, unfortunately there is not yet a good way of maintaining it or putting things on auto-blacklists/graylists.
Maybe we should just turn the auto-whitelist off completely until the SpamAssassin has better ways of dealing with it, that might help some already.
Regards, Georg
P.S. Be glad you don't have to see the mail that the SpamAssassin already DOES catch. :)
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:20:22PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra rms@1407.org wrote:
Spammers getting smart, aka subscribe then spam?
That and they got scored down for only sending in HTML rather than in both. I think maybe tweaking the scores for this list may be a good idea? ;-)
I didn't even got the message due to this procmail rule:
:0: * ^Content-Type: text/html spam
It really catches much spam (and mails from stupid people too).
Jeroen Dekkers
Il mar, 2002-03-05 alle 19:39, microdata ha scritto:
FYI: I contacted the company to complain about this message. A rapresentative answered me (by mail) and told me that their web server has been cracked. He apologised for the incident.
Ciao.