[ http://www.fsfe.org/fellows/greve/freedom_bits/six_questions_to_national_sta... ]
Six questions to national standardisation bodies
Tuesday 26 June 2007
It seems that many people have been confused by Microsoft's attempt at trying to portray MS-OOXML as an Open Standard, which includes methods such as paying bloggers to manipulate Wikipedia or trying to confuse people about competition on the basis of a common standard, which is generally good for competition, vs competition of multiple standards, which is generally bad for competition.
Since this confusion exists in many national standardisation bodies, it is not surprising to also find it on the net and in various online sources. If they are not outright manipulated, that is. So it comes as no surprise that journalists have a hard time to see through the smoke, and not everyone does as good a job as the Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ).
We therefore decided that it was time to help people working with the national standardisation bodies and journalists inform others about the issues in a way that would not require more than 5-10 minutes on the receiving end. The result has just gone online: Six questions to national standardisation bodies by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE), also available in a PDF for pretty printing. These six questions, namely
1. Application independence? 2. Supporting pre-existing Open Standards? 3. Backward compatibility for all vendors? 4. Proprietary extensions? 5. Dual standards? 6. Legally safe?
raise issues that every national standardisation body should have satisfactory answers for, otherwise it must vote No in the ISO/IEC process and request that Microsoft incorporate its work on MS-OOXML into ISO/IEC 26300:2006, the Open Document Format (ODF).
In order to counter the misinformation that is currently floating around on the net it is important to spread the word far and make sure that these six questions are submitted to every single national standardisation body and used as widely as possible to inform people in politics and media.
In case you want to link the page, you can use this button http://fsfeurope.org/graphics/msooxml_small.png
to link to the page, which exists in two versions:
* 250x98 pixel version, code:
<a href="http://fsfeurope.org/documents/msooxml-questions" border="0"><img src="http://fsfeurope.org/graphics/msooxml_small.png" /></a>
* 500x195 pixels version, code:
<a href="http://fsfeurope.org/documents/msooxml-questions" border="0"><img src="http://fsfeurope.org/graphics/msooxml.png" /></a>
Please help us spread the word.
On Tuesday 26 June 2007, Georg C. F. Greve wrote:
[ http://www.fsfe.org/fellows/greve/freedom_bits/six_questions_to_national_st andardisation_bodies ]
Six questions to national standardisation bodies
[...]
I appreciate this step taken by the FSFE. Hopefully this will help to improve competition on the office suite market and size down one of the two Microsoft cash cows.
In case you want to link the page, you can use this button http://fsfeurope.org/graphics/msooxml_small.png
to link to the page, which exists in two versions:
* 250x98 pixel version, code: <a href="http://fsfeurope.org/documents/msooxml-questions" border="0"><img src="http://fsfeurope.org/graphics/msooxml_small.png" /></a> * 500x195 pixels version, code: <a href="http://fsfeurope.org/documents/msooxml-questions" border="0"><img src="http://fsfeurope.org/graphics/msooxml.png" /></a>
Please help us spread the word.
Due to a lack of layout control I need a 200px width banner version. Can I shrink PNG myself or does anyone adds a smaller version?
Anastasios
On 26-Jun-2007, Anastasios Hatzis wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007, Georg C. F. Greve wrote:
* 500x195 pixels version, code: <a href="http://fsfeurope.org/documents/msooxml-questions" border="0"><img src="http://fsfeurope.org/graphics/msooxml.png" /></a>
Due to a lack of layout control I need a 200px width banner version. Can I shrink PNG myself or does anyone adds a smaller version?
You can use The GIMP to do so interactively; or you can install the "graphicsmagick" package and use the following command:
$ gm convert msooxml.png -geometry 200 msooxml.200.png
The aspect ratio will be maintained:
$ gm identify msooxml.png msooxml.200.png msooxml.png[1] PNG 500x195+0+0 DirectClass 8-bit 37.0k 0.040u 0:01 msooxml.200.png PNG 200x78+0+0 DirectClass 8-bit 13.5k 0.010u 0:01
[ http://www.fsfe.org/fellows/greve/freedom_bits/six_questions_to_national_sta... ]
Six questions to national standardisation bodies
Is it OK to translate and distribute this text in other languages?
|| On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:18:20 +0200 || "Novica Nakov" nnovica@gmail.com wrote:
nn> Is it OK to translate and distribute this text in other languages?
It is not just OK, it would be very helpful if you could do that.
FYI: Translations of FSFE are generally coordinated on a dedicated mailing list, see [1] to avoid double work and we would gladly put translations into all languages online on fsfeurope.org.
Thank you very much in advance for any help you could provide,
Best regards, Georg
[1] http://fsfeurope.org/contribute/translators