On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:41:07PM +0100, Samuel Liddicott wrote:
I'm going to say it again, that "distribution" needs clarification. Either I am wrong or Stefano is, but it needs clarifying by more than folk contradicting eachother.
Can I suggest that FSF lawyers produce some sample scenarios by way of explanation. I will donate time to produce a web-based wizard where folk can tick boxes to show what they want to do with the software and the wizard explains the subsequent obligations they will be under. We all know that don't distribute means practically no further obligations but there is no common understanding of "distribute".
This would be really cool to have such a tool !
BTW I asked the question because I expected some clarification :-)
Thanks to all who answered so far, even if this is a bit confusing, at least this shows this is a difficult problem
Jerome Alet