On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 19:01 +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
I'm surprised that a member of a GPL drafting committees[*] was not told where the AGPL is currently causing problems when being asked to review a GPL that adds compatibility with it. Weren't the committees given briefings on the current use of these licences? Didn't they ask?
I am replying to this only because you keep trying to put the drafting process in bad light since its inception.
I said that *I* didn't pay much attention to it. Your implications about a faulty drafting process are mere speculation in bad faith.
So long.