On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:55:06AM +0100, Jerome Alet wrote:
http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/2003-February/003775.html
As an experiment, I've implemented such a (somewhat modified) distribution scheme for a project of mine,
I don't see anything that is different.
The GPL explicitly allows charging for distributing software: | You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and | you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee. (section 1)
So, what's different?