Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
As you claim to understand the FDL much better than others, could you explain whether or not the FDL would allow this case at all, and if so, what it would mean for the mentioned sections (of course, backing this up with references to the FDL text).
I didn't make such a claim, or even implied it.
If you accuse others of not even having read it based on your interpretations, and constantly express your interpretations of it as facts, not opinions, you clearly do imply it.
Now, are you going to answer to the main points, instead of picking on side-issues again?
Frank