Joack@gmx.net writes:
Surely it istn't the usual way for rms (as was claimed) to get involved in other peoples projects, is it?
Question: was RMS originally involved in glibc?
This release is really bad publicity, I think, and it does go well with what "people say". This is the first instance that somebody actully says it has happened to him. (That I know of)
Question: Why would this redhat employee wish to weaken RMS?
Emacs/XEmacs seems the most similar previous case to this, but I could be wrong.
Do you know more? Who, where do they claim this?
I too would like to know.