Hi Paul,
[deliberately breaking the thread, so this does not get drowned in unrelated stuff, only quoting a bit]
Am Freitag 31 August 2018 15:35:21 schrieb Paul Boddie:
Unfortunately, the "for exposure" culture encourages people to overstretch.
It is just one out of several motivations to develop Free Software or participate actively in a community.
In general I think the good effects of "for exposure" are exaggerated in society, it seems to be a problem of modern social media.
ut the "for exposure" argument is overblown in other parts of society as well, it is a general problem of modern social media. Just think about influencers.
In one case in the Python community, someone who had been "all over" every topic of concern eventually burned out:
It is sad to read. We can find many examples. When making policies and organisating, we need to keep looking out for a work/volunteer/life balance. Doing this for Free Software is quite similiar to other job or honorary positions.
since this kind of "noble volunteerism" meshes with a popular flavours of capitalism, such people and the lessons they have for us are readily forgotten, their misfortune seen as "regrettable" but somehow an acceptable cost to bring about other people's success.
At least not here. We must teach people how to keep the balance, make good choices and we need to make sure that the structure in society allows for people to grow, be happy. Hopefully even catching them, if they stumble and fall.
I mention this particularly because it may help some people to understand why people become so aggrieved and feel mistreated.
It is one reason to become aggieved, there are others as well. However when being in such a state it is more important to watch out for oneself and leave the situation which causes this sort of stress. And while surrounding people maybe empathic, they also need to be clear to draw a line and sometimes to end the situation to protect themselfs and this person in an emotional difficult situation.
== Professional offerings for Free Software
There most certainly are professional offerings, yes. But then again, there are people like Werner whose PGP libraries are being used by billion dollar corporations as the foundation of their businesses' operational viability, and yet it apparently took security scares in other cryptographic libraries and Edward Snowden's remarks to crack open wallets and get things funded at a more tolerable level.
The publications of Edward Snowden were a wakeup call for some. It maybe sad that it sometimes has to make headlines before people take some action.
However I believe that the growing numbers of supporters of FSFE also support our mission because they like what we are explaining it to more policy makers and companies why funding better Free Software is in their own best interest (while being better for society as well).
I am arguing against the zero-sum game played by various businesses, the result of which is a shoal of little fish whose only defence is not to be big enough to be noticed by the big (proprietary) fish that everybody else has to deal with.
This seems to say that many Free Software businesses could do something in a better way. While I agree that offerings could be better, this would also take customers to be willing to buy those offerings. It is a circle and if we want it to grow, we can act at any situation. (This is why I had started paying for Free Software many years ago.)
From conversations I have had over the years, I sometimes wonder whether certain companies regard their Free Software competitors as worse enemies than the proprietary vendors and solutions they should all be doing their best to defeat. So that game of divide and rule continues, of course.
To me it seem natural that the small company offering something similar to yours is often seen as competitor. However there are business associations where the same companies are working together. E.g. the Open Source Business Alliance in Germany.
From personal experience I can say that it is a challenge to cooperate with many companies, just size would not get you the contracts. (My company does cooperate as much as we can, this is why I know it is difficult.)
Best Regards, Bernhard