Jan-Oliver Wagner writes:
A free software magazine is missing since all the Linux magazines turn to proprietary products more and more.
Is this referring to the copyright of the magazines themselves or the fact that most of them report often approvingly popular proprietary software that happens to run on GNU/Linux, such as kylix, oracle, netscape communic.?
Most appear not capable to explain free software, some authors even have not understood the concept.
That's especially dangerous in comments about lets say the MS Fud against GPL. Some 'Linux' Magazines respond to this by praising companies whose business partly consists of trickily proprietarized distribution of free software, using euphemisms like 'value added'.
Klaus Schilling