On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 11:41 +0100, Laurence Finston wrote:
I don't believe that a library becomes a "derived work" of a program that includes it (it was the "and vice versa" part). I meant that I don't entirely agree with what's said at `http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation'. Since it probably won't become relevant for me, I don't see any reason to bring up the subject at the FSF.
I'd like to help you with a reference to writing books.
Including libraries (dinamically or staticly is just a simple optimization means) is like including a text into the book, without which, the book is unreadable.
This is not similar to a bibliographic reference.
Rui