Le mardi 10 janvier 2006 à 19:58 +0100, Christoph Neuroth a écrit :
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 12:54, Sam Liddicott wrote:
Typo3 is good.
In this case I suggest use of Campsite http://www.campware.org/
I will have a look at campsite later; but can you give us an overview of what you think are the benefits over typo3? Bjoern Schiessle contacted me via private mail and offered his help so I think we can get a running site up... Here's what I think is needed:
- Port the old design to a Content Management system
- Implement a new, more direct workflow system. Gregor: What do you think is
the best? It could be quite similar to the old system; we just woulnd't need the "web volunteers" any more as you could do the publishing yourself easily using the CMS... 3) Include the older issues (easy enough once the CMS is running) 4) (Mabye) implement a new design
Any comments?
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 15:30 +0100, Georg C. F. Greve a écrit :
I have found myself thinking that a CMS (Drupal? Typo3?) or maybe a Blogging Software (Wordpress?) with review and workgroup management and authorisation capabilites, as well as the possibility to add modules like automatically emailing certain language versions to people who subscribed to them might be a good idea.
I don't know enough about CMS to debat on which is the best, but Georg gave a pretty good (even if general) view of what's needed and I trust the "ones who know" to choose and get it up right. I can only emphasize the need for an ease to edit, but also to translate the content. As Christoph, I'd like to read about the compared benefits of proposed CMS.
Is there a place I can download untranslated English texts to start working on the French version ? My German is not good enough to do the job though.
Gdl.