Hi all,
Am 29.07.2014 14:14, schrieb Garreau, Alexandre:
Le 29/07/2014 à 13h31, Werner Koch a écrit :
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:09, galex-713@galex-713.eu said:
For exemple, a Debian *OS* is *by default* fully free, but Debian *project* (or at least people too close to it) often encourage you to install proprietary software, notably through nonfree repository, where
Right, I am one of those who would encourage on pragmatic reasons to use the non-free repository to install documentation for most GNU software.
Well, a repository for non-free documentation would be better, since documentation hasn’t to be as free as functional software (for reasons explained by FSF) and therefore doesn’t cause ethical problems, while proprietary software does.
I wonder whether anyone believes in this, sorry.
I omitted the GFDL sad story deliberately, though, because it's really just distracting.
Best wishes Michael