Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
You are confusing a already written work, and a work that doesn't yet exist where one invents something from scratch. The later is infact protected by libel, slander, and other such laws. The former is not.
Yet another unfounded claim. Can you back it up with some arguments or references? Otherwise you're just wasting our time.
Clearly, if you consider it false, it is your job to back it up. Not mine.
You make the claim, you have to prove it. Do you believe "valid until disproven" is a reasonable method of argument?
The only person wasting anyones time is you. If you are to lazy to look it up in a legal codex, please refrain from participating in this discussion. What I have written is clearly stated in several legal codexes around the world, including the license of which a work is licensed under.
References please!
That you are to lazy to be bothered to read any of this,
I read all the refences you provided (which are exactly zero, so far).
and resort to inflammatory remarks is simply sad.
What exactly was inflammatory in my comment? This is another claim (and accusation) you made that you need to back up.
Frank