Hello,
I produced a summary of a longer debate on the German discussion
list which addressed a lot of aspects that may be relevant to other
European countries. Please comment here on this list or per PM. The
text below is also available as a blog post [0].
The [1] trigger was a letter that a school kid brought home, informing
the parents that a Windows 10 device with MS Office 2013/2016 will be
made mandatory to participate in class.
As outrageous this sounds for Free Software supporters, I fear that
this is getting common practice throughout Europe and that most
parents accept it with a shrug. I’ll be happy for any feedback
dispelling or confirming this fear.
Is there a template letter to complain about it?
The original poster asked if there was template letter for such cases
that he could use to inform the school that this practice is not what
he expects from a public body.
Wouldn't it be nice to have such a template or maybe even a booklet of
templates? As English is most commonly understood in Europe, it would
be best to start with an English version and move on with
[2]translations into other languages. In fact, [3]creating a section
with sample letters has been on our wish list for years already! Feel
free to plunge in!
There are currently two versions of the draft: [4]one and [5]two, both
German. (By the way: the FSFE maintains a [6]public Etherpad you can
use for such cases.)
As the last post in the discussion so far, Max shared some brief
findings from the [7]European Free Software Policy Meeting in
Brussels, that it is difficult to “convince” in a letter. It is
important not to exaggerate and point out the benefits of the
recipient.
Advocating Free Software or demand our rights?
It was discussed whether the focus of the letter should be to convince
the school that Free Software is a great thing or rather that they are
obliged to leave the minority the right to keep using the systems of
their choice.
Some may argue that the majority is using Windows anyway and simply
won’t care. Does that entitle a public school to force those who do
care to give up their freedom and privacy?
Are we in such a weak position that we have to beg the institutions to
let us use Free Software or is there any legal ground where we can
claim the right to do so?
Use your right to participate!
Either way, we should make our voice heard more often. During the
course of the discussion, Michael encouraged parents to use their
right to participate in decision making processes in their kids’
schools. This process is highly regulated in Germany and what parents
can actually do is limited but still, they do have a say on school
matters. How is this done elsewhere in Europe?
Is this practice even legal?
Public schools force their students/pupils to use a certain operating
system with [8]known back doors, with a certain office suite using a
certain cloud software and various kinds of privacy issues, e.g.:
storing personal data in a different jurisdiction.
Is this practice legal? The answer seems to vary depending on which
federal state in Germany you look at. How is it in your area? Do you
know any rules or laws that would prohibit this kind of practice?
A while back in Switzerland, an [9]expert group recommended to use
Free Software after analysing Microsoft's offer called live@edu back
then due to privacy and lock-in concerns. Data protection law would
prohibit the data collection mentioned in the proposed contract.
Proposed analogies
To make the problem more transparent to the recipient of the letter,
it was proposed to ask: “What would you say if a teacher forced the
kids to come to the gym with a special model of sneakers?”
It was mentioned that a similar practice is accepted, and even the
default, when it comes to school books. The schools decide what books
will be used in class. Why should it be any different with Software?
“The Chains of Habit Are Too Light To Be Felt Until They Are Too
Heavy To Be Broken.”
[10]Source unknown, sometimes used by Warren
Buffet
I am grateful to Bernd who pointed out that these analogies are
missing a crucial aspect. What shoes I wear will not change the way I
run and I’ll be as fast with a similar pair of shoes as with the ones
I was asked to buy for class. A certain schoolbook will not change the
way I read nor change my ability to read or understand complex texts
in other books.
Software is fundamentally different. Using a certain software program
defines a certain work flow and way of thinking. Learning a certain
work flow and get effective with it takes time and effort (with any
software). Almost nobody has the motivation or resources to
constantly change the way to get a routine task done, especially not
if one is already comfortable with one. Just ask a vim user to use
emacs!
The program I use to do my homework will probably be the same I write
my first job applications with. And the file format will most likely
be the same as well as the place where I save them “in the cloud”.
Forcing pupils to use proprietary software, will push them into the
lock-in trap.
Equality of opportunity
or the widening “Rich-Poor Achievement Gap” may be another argument
against such practices. What burden may it be for a poor family to
purchase a computer that meets the requirements of Windows 10? They
have to buy that computer. There is no way around it. So, they will
have to relinquish something else like healthy food or family time as
they have to spend more time at work.
Bad publicity or positive campaigning
One thesis in the discussion was that only bad publicity will make the
school at hand reconsider their practice. FSFE usually tries to follow
a different approach. That doesn't mean we'd ignore bad news and don't
deal with them. The question is: [11]What will make people change
their view? I think it is much more sustainable if the people grasp
the idea and benefits of Free Software instead of just “being forced
to allow it”.
Point out the learning aspect of using Free Software
Geza suggested to mention the pedagogical angle as well. Free Software
offers diversity, allows to experiment and try out various
alternatives (different editors, programming languages, desktop
environments) and thus leads to a competent self determined and
responsible handling of the opportunities available.
Part of the problem is that teachers usually don't know anything else
than MS products themselves as they've been in the same
creature-of-habit cycle as they are about to push their students.
Sample lesson with OneNote
Bernd pointed us to a tutorial [12]video how OneNote can be used in
class and had to admit that it looks pretty impressive and that there
is probably no Free Software alternative which would allow a similar
work flow.
Bernd is missing an easy to use alternative. Without these
alternatives, it is difficult to object (object in the sense of
“successfully convince others”).
To create a [13]video that starts a thinking process has been on our
ToDo list for a while.
Wanted: Show case of Free Software solutions that are actually being
used
It was mentioned that with a list of programs, the same thing could be
achieved, but it is highly questionable if this zoo of different
applications will ever be used in class.
It is clear that a lot of good stuff can be done with Free Software,
but we need to show to the interested audience that it is practical as
well. We need you! Do you know somebody using Free Software in class
that is willing to create a presentation? Do you know presentations
that have been given before and were recorded (preferably under a free
licence)?
Are you aware of any educational institution that teaches on/about
Free Software?
Going-to-be teachers need to see what is possible with Free Software.
It needs to be proven that Free Software can deliver exactly what they
need.
Not necessarily what they think they need. It's not my goal to mimic
OneNote or other proprietary products. At the end, the work flow in
the tutorial wasn't that smooth either. DG said: “Pupils may not be
nerds but shouldn't be the school the place to learn how to use
digital tools creatively without having a company make a product out
of one particular use case? Until this isn't done in school – teaching
how to use digital tools meaningfully and creatively – the perception
that Free Software is only for nerds will stick.”
Looking forward to your contributions!
Guido
Visible links
0. http://blogs.fsfe.org/guido/2016/04/public-schools-making-ms-office-mandato…
1. http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/fsfe-de/2015-December/007492.html
2. https://fsfe.org/contribute/translators/translators
3. https://action.fsfe.org/ticket/16
4. https://piratenpad.de/p/IGS-Sassenbug_-_Mobiles_lernen
5. https://piratenpad.de/p/IGS-Sassenbug_-_Mobiles_lernen_2
6. https://public.pad.fsfe.org/
7. https://fsfe.org/news/2016/news-20160205-01.en.html
8. http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/insider/forum/insider_wintp-insider_secu…
9. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/news/ch-school-it-agency-recommends-switching-o…
10. http://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/07/13/chains-of-habit/
11. https://blogs.fsfe.org/jelle/2010/10/31/advocacy-doesnt-work-if-you-tell-so…
12. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECBOAOa7dxI
13. https://action.fsfe.org/ticket/19
--
Guido Arnold Free Software Foundation Europe
https://blogs.fsfe.org/guido [] Edu team & German team
OpenPGP Key-ID: 0x51628D75 [][][] Get active!
XMPP: guido(a)jabber.fsfe.org || https://fsfe.org
This was raised on the FSFE Manchester list:
http://www.travelspirit.io/manchester-conference-june-2016/
I had some discussion with the organizers, they intend to have some
panel discussions, including one on Personal Data/Cyber Security Issues
as they relate to mobility and transport services and they had asked if
I could join that.
It looks like a good publicity and networking opportunity, probably most
appropriate for somebody who is interested in the intersection of big
data, free/open source software and public transport/mobility services.
It would be good to see a voice there from somebody who has solid
understanding of software freedom principles and how using them properly
can address those challenges. I had looked at going up there myself but
I have a couple of other projects going on that make it hard for me to
give a definitive commitment.
I don't know if they have travel budget available, if anybody is
interested they would need to discuss with the organizers or maybe query
FSFE. There are various local free software groups, including FSFE
Manchester, Manchester Free Software and some groups at the university.
Having lived up there, I can highly recommend visiting Manchester and
for anybody who may go there from outside the UK, there are many direct
flights, you don't have to go via London.
Please contact Simon (on CC) if you would like more details.
Regards,
Daniel
Dear all,
in case you are interested, I have put FSFE's finanical results of 2015
online (like every year):
https://fsfe.org/about/funds/2015.html
Thanks,
--
Reinhard Müller * Financial Officer
* Free Software Foundation Europe *
https://emanuelfeld.github.io/blog/2016/04/27/government-github-ecosystem.h…
The government GitHub ecosystem
Apr 27, 2016
Emanuel Feld
Governments have been flocking to GitHub.
Their reasons are plenty: the promise of “private sector” tools, a
conviction that publicly-funded code should be public, the company’s
evangelism (and stickers), etc. Whatever the case, GitHub now hosts at
least 600 government organizations, with over 9,000 public repositories
between them.
I had a notion of the global ecosystem this activity has sprouted—the
players and their interactions—but wanted to back it up with data.
So, using GitHub’s API, I compiled a database of government GitHub
organizations, their repositories, members, and contributors and dove in.
Summary
Overall, reuse within the government GitHub “ecosystem” is uneven and
limited.
Nearly all popular repositories (inside and outside of government) were
created by US and UK national organizations. The bulk are standards or
frameworks. Modular products, like data.gov.uk’s CKAN extensions, also
seem relatively reusable.
Collaborative work and reuse is most concentrated within the large US
and UK national-level networks. This may point to the importance of
scale, “real world” interactions (e.g. talks, meet-ups, employees
switching between organizations), and the alignment of policy
priorities, timelines, licensing, and tech stacks.
14% of repositories have no further activity after being posted to
GitHub. 46% remain under development a year after they were created.
I didn’t find a license file for half of the repositories. At least 13%
use the MIT license. At least 8% use some version of the GPL. License
choice varies geographically.
Government GitHub organizations are bringing some new users to the
platform along with them. But 45% of the users predate the government
organizations they contribute to.
Estonia has the most government repositories per capita at 72.8 per
million residents (hover over and click to zoom in on the map up top).
[...]
The FSFE wiki has details about manually configuring[1] the Fellowship
smartcards.
I've started a wiki[2] and discussion in debian-devel[3] about using a
Debian Live CD to run a clean-room environment (without network) with a
whiptail-based UI (similar to Debian installer, etc) for managing the
lifecycle of master keys and smartcards. This would eliminate the need
to remember or look up command line instructions.
One use for such a Live CD is that it could be posted out to new fellows
so they can get started more quickly.
It would be interesting to get any feedback people have about the
workflow in the wiki[2].
Regards,
Daniel
1. http://wiki.fsfe.org/TechDocs/CardHowtos/CardWithSubkeysUsingBackups
2. https://wiki.debian.org/OpenPGP/CleanRoomLiveEnvironment
3. https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/571DD206.1070502@pocock.pro
Hello Timothy Pearson
wouldn't this way not be better:
https://diasp.eu/posts/4205465
(compy of the Text below)
with kind regards
Marc Jr Landolt
eidg. dipl. Informatiker HF
Rombachtäli 13
5022 Rombach
+41 79 291 07 87
2009(a)marclandolt.ch
----------------------SNIP----------------------
Wouldn’t it be more useful / **rational** / environment-saving to
legally gain access to the hidden (anti-)features of #Intel ME or the
AMDxyz?
Reasons:
-There are to much x86 Systems in use => d$/dt
-If these Systems eg have access to things like #US4877027
#WO2005055579A1 #US6169924B1 #US6506148 it does not really help to have
one single system, that is not infected
-I guess ARM also isn’t State-Less-Computing [1]
[me.TODO<learningList>.add(“Read ARM Specs”)]
[1]
https://media.ccc.de/v/32c3-7352-towards_reasonably_trustworthy_x86_laptops
-Worst case raptorengineeringinc.com would be a CIA/NSA #HoneyPot to
find gifted FOSS Users for “pinguen-hunt” ?
-it has the nasty eagle in the logo
-twice the link is shown, so people click on it in the end => one exit
point from this post (n!)
-d$/dt would end at raptorengineeringinc.com
-expensive 3700$, you can buy a Orange PI for 24$ inclusive shipment cost
“raptor and engineering” would attract ~20 Year old people, that just
woke up from the american dream
-raptor sounds cool
-engineering appeals to the low self-esteem from 20 Year old man (like
we all) that have not been cared of by their parents
-inc suggests company, group, low self-esteem
(Prerequisites: People that are alone += 🐧🐧🐧🐧)
word count of the post:
[ATTACHEMENT]
-“more POWER” ⇨ low self-esteem ⇦ Stupid Parents!!!
Things we already know:
http://marclandolt.ch/ml_buzzernet/2015/10/16/zusammenfassung-von-pinkibrai…
#Linux #Anon #Anonymous ?
Dear all,
as announced in our February newsletter [1] and as a recent news item [2], in
2016 the FSFE is going to organise its first ever summit that will happen from
September 2nd to 4th in the Berlin Congress Center [3]. We celebrate 15 years
of existence this year and dedicate our summit to you, our community all over
Europe. You are the ones who made us strong. The summit will be free of
admission and highly participatory to let Free Software enthusiasts across
Europe use, study, share and improve their skills and knowledge about Free
Software and beyond - together.
The summit will be full days the weekend of September 3 / 4. One day in
advance, on Friday, FSFE invites to a full day about "Running successful
business with Free Software". For both events we are looking for speakers,
input, volunteers and participants.
Please find all the details about the summit, about proposing talks and
volunteering on our wiki page:
https://wiki.fsfe.org/Events/Summit2016/CallForParticipation
Please share this call on your private and public channels and be aware that
the deadline to apply as a speaker is already May 17!
Thank you very much and looking forward to an interesting event,
Erik Albers
Your friendly event organiser (summit2016(a)fsfe.org)
[1] https://fsfe.org/news/nl/nl-201602
[2] https://fsfe.org/news/2016/news-20160428-01
[3] located in the center of Berlin, Germany: http://www.bcc-berlin.de/en
--
No one shall ever be forced to use non-free software
Erik Albers | FSFE | https://fsfe.org/about/albers
OpenPGP Key-ID: 0x8639DC81 on keys.gnupg.net
Hello!
Am Freitag, 8. April 2016 12:08:34 schrieb Matthias Kirschner:
> From all we heard it is very helpful if you spent a few
> minutes and submit your ideas.
>
http://k7r.eu/urgent-help-until-10-april-to-influence-how-750-millions-will…
I had about 45 Minutes to phrase my reply, I still hope it is useful.
Best,
Bernhard
ps.: resend because my first attempt did not seem to have made it.
== Details, of BER's submission to
https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/nextgen-internet
== Your occupation and expertise
Entrepreneur, Company owner for Security and complex applications.
Academic grades: Dipl. Applied System Scientist (University of Osnabrück,
DE), MSc. Geographie (University of Milwaukee, US)
More Details: http://intevation.de/~bernhard/index.en.html
== Status of the Internet in 2016
The internet is an important backbone of society and overall humanity.
Net Neutrality is very important because only competition will enable
smaller companies to be innovative and this is what Net Neutrality is about.
There is a trend to more mobile devices and internet via mobile phone
networks. Open Standards, like the IETFs RFCs have enabled the success of the
internet, as have Free Software implementations like sendmail, the TCP/IP
stack that Microsoft integrated, the Apache Webserver and Web Browsers.
There is a tendency to analyse data traffic and offer advertisments and
content which shifts power to large software and "content" providers outside
of Europe.
== View towards 2025 and beyond
=== How do you think the internet will look like in 2025 and beyond?
It is still there with many more devices and it will be still decentral.
It is very hard to predict the development over a time frame of 10 years
as the last 10 years have shown that we will see disruptive changes
because of business models or policital events.
In a negative scenario corporations and autocratic countries
will have gained more influence.
In an optimistic scenario self-confident countries
like the EU will have grown technical, political and business power
to shape the future for their citizens via a democratic process,
protecting privacy and people's interest. Maybe even a charter
of human internet rights will be developed.
=== What will be the essential functional building blocks of the Internet
then?
Open access, open standards, regulation that aims for the balance
of power of smaller organisations and people versus larger organisations
and governments.
Free Software technology that offers software and hardware building
blocks so that run the basic infrastructure from the network to
the application layers.
=== Could you indicate where we should focus our activity research in the
next 5-10 years to achieve? Are there new field of research to
create/develop?
In order to enable privacy, research should look into a "proxy world",
where the use of proxy businesses and technology will enable business
models based on data without compromising individual privacy. This will
have to be supported by technology and regulations.
Consider a business practive in Germany where pharmacies cannot be
directly be coupled with medial doctors in order to support and offer an
infrastructure that maintains decentral distribution of medial drugs.
The same could be done for example with a video stream provider which
would be force to run their stream through a business proxy, where a
number of users for a city buys their stream and the data will be
anonymized. The video vendor gets (most of)) the wanted data (which TV-
show is watched how often), can even sell advertisment, but does not know
the single customer, whos privacy is protected.
Another area is trusted computing, where research is necessary how
regulation can force sure that each owner or intermediate can add their
own trust anchor certificates in the chain for their devices or
application. So that Google, Apple and Microsoft do not control the
certificates for what can run on a certain machine.
Example: If you want to run a webserver, you need a certificate that is
within the common browsers, Microsoft is the main gatekeeper for this.
Second example: With "secure boot" or "app stores" only binary can be run
that the providers of the software allow. Thus Apple controls the apps
that can run on Smartphones and the Google Play store is the only app
store on Android phones that can update applications all together
automatically, other stores are second class.
A third area is open standards that adhere to the minimalistic design
criteria
for data exchange formats, which is important for competition and
security.
See my article
https://fsfe.org/activities/os/minimalisticstandards.en.html .
A fourth area will be anonymous micropayment models, so that small
content providers would have the ability to create business models
without special right holding organisation like the German GEMA.
--
FSFE -- Founding Member of the GA blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard
Support our work for Free Software: https://fsfe.org/support/?ber